February 5, 2023

Top lawmakers just responded to Trump’s Syria bombing with powerful message he can’t ignore

- Advertisement Above -

At least a few Congressional leaders were upset enough about the abrogation of the legislative body’s exclusive constitutional right to declare war that they spoke up against President Trump’s bombing attack on Syria last night.


The Hill is reporting at least one Republican congressman, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), joined House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) in condemning the president for not consulting Congress for authorization to conduct the airstrikes as the Constitution specifies, despite a general agreement amongst the legislators that the chemical weapons attack by Syrian President Assad against his own citizens in violation of international law deserved a response of some kind.

Other Congressional leaders to took to Twitter to express their views.

Sponsored Links

Add your name to millions demanding Congress take action on the President’s crimes. IMPEACH TRUMP & PENCE!

Sponsored Links

While the members of Congress are rightfully disturbed by Trump’s unconstitutional seizure of war powers that they have not granted him, some members were also concerned about the scattershot nature of Trump’s foreign policy at a time when the State Department is leaderless as Mike Pompeo awaits confirmation hearings to replace Rex Tillerson as Secretary and many crucial posts in the department remain unfilled.

“The President must come to Congress and secure an Authorization for Use of Military Force by proposing a comprehensive strategy with clear objectives that keep our military safe and avoid collateral damage to innocent civilians,” Rep. Pelosi said in a statement.

Senator Kaine was equally scathing in his comments.

Sponsored Links

President Trump’s decision to launch airstrikes against the Syrian government without Congress’s approval is illegal and – absent a broader strategy – it’s reckless,” Kaine said. “Last week, President Trump was adamant that the U.S. was leaving Syria imminently. This week, he is opening a new military front.”

However justified retaliation against the immoral and illegal use of banned chemical agents may be, particularly when used against innocent civilians, the Constitution clearly lays out exactly how our nation should undertake the decision to use military force.

While other presidents dating back to Harry Truman have usurped congressional power when ordering military action in their role as Commander-in-Chief, Congress has often opted to pass broad bills authorizing the use of military force to handle conflicts like the Vietnam War and the War on Terror that stop short of formal declarations of war, yet still allow the president to commit forces to global conflicts.

The difference now, of course, is that we have never before had a president so inexperienced and unstable that allowing him free reign over our armed forces without the restraining influence of the government’s legislative body amounts to a Congressional dereliction of duty.

Congress needs to act now to pass legislation clearly outlining the limits on the President’s use of force in all of our current global conflicts before facts on the ground overtake their sluggish response.

Follow Vinnie Longobardo on Twitter.

Vinnie Longobardo

is the Managing Editor of Washington Press and a 35-year veteran of the TV, mobile, & internet industries, specializing in start-ups and the international media business. His passions are politics, music, and art.

Sponsored Links