May 25, 2022

Mueller just veered his investigation to the heart of Trump’s Russian treason

Sponsored Links

President Trump may repeatedly deny that he or his presidential campaign colluded with the Russians as they interfered in the 2016 election but Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his team appear to be closing in on evidence that the Trump campaign did just that.

Reuters is reporting, based on at least two sources, that Mueller’s investigators are asking questions about events at the July 2016 Republican National Convention in Cleveland where Trump was officially nominated as the party’s standard-bearer.

Add your name to millions demanding Congress take action on the President’s crimes. IMPEACH TRUMP & PENCE!

Sponsored Links

Mueller isn’t commenting, but Reuters claims that its sources say they have been asked by his team about an event during the convention attended by both Russia’s Ambassador to the U.S. and then-Senator Jeff Sessions, who is now the U.S. Attorney General.

Mueller’s team is also asking about language omitted at the last minute from the Republican Party platform which was considered hostile to Russia.

Sponsored Links

The questions about Sessions relate to a party during the convention which was attended by both Sessions, who was an early and active supporter of Trump, and then-Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak, who is widely believed to have ties to secret Russian intelligence and spying activities. 

Sponsored Links

Mueller’s investigators are also asking about an April 2016 event at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C. where Trump gave a speech. Sessions was there as was Kislyak, and investigators want to know if the two were seen together talking more than to say a quick hello, which is what Sessions claims happened.

Mueller’s team has apparently interviewed multiple people regarding the issue of how the platform was watered down to be more friendly to Russia.

During the platform discussions, Diana Denman, a member of the platform committee’s national security subcommittee, called for language in which the U.S. would promise to supply “lethal defensive weapons” to the Ukraine arms forces in coordination with NATO.

This happened while Russia’s invasion of eastern Ukraine and seizure of the Crimea territory was still fresh in everyone’s mind.

The final platform, however, did not contain the words “lethal defensive weapons,” which Reuters notes “made the platform less hostile to Russia.”

Sponsored Links

In 2016, not long after the convention, Denman told Reuters that J.D. Gordon, a Trump foreign policy advisor, would speak to Trump’s team about the language and that it was Trump’s campaign that played “a direct role in softening the platform language.”

The Trump campaign denies that it was behind the deletion of that language and Gordon has called Denman’s version “inaccurate,” but no one has come up with a factual alternative reason as to why it happened.

What this suggests is that after months of circling the question of whether Trump is the ultimate target, Mueller and his team are getting closer to the president and what really happened during the campaign with regard to Russia. 

Trump has such a proven history of fabricating falsehoods and twisting the truth that nothing he utters can be taken at face value, but if Mueller can come up with facts and strong evidence that collusion did take place, it will trump all the president’s lies.

Benjamin Locke

Benjamin Locke is a retired college professor with an undergraduate degree in Industrial Labor and Relations from Cornell University and an MBA from the European School of Management.

Sponsored Links